These 6 tilings all form their own single-member regiments. Being omnitruncates, they have no subsymmetry, and generally are somewhat crazy looking. Some of them can be alternated into snubs from category 6. Omnitruncated squat is just tosquat. As mentioned in category 4, all of these are capable of being blended into trapeziverts somehow. Qrasquit and satsa see use in honeycombs, the hexattics (grothat, quitothit, thotithit, hatha) do not. Their vertex figures are all scalene triangles.
Only grothat is convex. Tosquat, hexat, and azip are the other convex tilings that can be interpreted under omnitruncate subsymmetry.
25: Grothat - Great rhombitrihexagonal tiling. Its faces are squares, hexagons, and dodecagons. Symbol is x3x6x. This is the omnitruncate of hexattic symmetry.
These cases are like quitco and quitdid (and i guess gaquatid), where they have a linear coxeter diagram with exactly one polygon retrograde. Quitsquat can also be formed as an omnitruncate with a linear cd, but it's both supersymmetrical and has 2 retrogrades, so it doesn't really fit here.
26: Qrasquit - Quasirhombated square tiling. Its faces are squares, octagrams, and octagons. Symbol is x4x4/3x. This guy is often used in honeycombs, and its relations with sossa makes it do interesting things sometimes.
27: Quitothit - Quasitruncated trihexagonal tiling. Its faces are squares, hexagons, and dodecagrams. Symbol is x3x6/5x. Continuing the trend from quitco and quitdid, this isn't actually a quasitruncated that.
Thotithit is the direct analogue to cotco and idtid, and follows the same exact pattern in coxeter diagrams. There isn't really a squattic cotco, cotcoics are an {n,3} symmetry phenomenon.
28: Thotithit - Trihexatruncated trihexagonal tiling. Its faces are hexagons, dodecagrams, and dodecagons. Symbol is x3x6x6/5*a. Continuing the trend from cotco and idtid, trihexatruncated is a term with no meaning. This tiling actually has a superregiment! Wanna know what's in it? A compound of hexats, and nothing else. So that's unfortunate.
Forgive me for inventing new terminology, but the bowers idea of a cotcoic has reasonable extension to this type. These have nonlinear diagrams, only conditionally exist for some regulars (all euclidean tilings, even dense ones), and satsa continues to see use as a component in the weirder higher dimensional omnitruncates, like cotco. So I'm going to extend the notion of a cotcoic and create the term "satsaic", which refers to anything that uses satsa or hatha or their dense analogues. Some objects will contain cotcoes and satsas, and will lovingly be referred to as "cotcoic satsaics", but these cases are rare. Visually, these kinda look more like cotco than thotithit does, but do not be fooled.
29: Satsa - Squariapeirotruncated squariapeirogonal tiling. Its faces are octagrams, octagons, and apeirogons. Symbol is x4x4/3x∞*a. This one sees some blending in category 8, as a part of sossa's shenanigans. Yes, squariapeirotruncated isn't a word with meaning. Do NOT try to squariapeirotruncate a cube.
30: Hatha - Hexaapeirotruncated hexaapeirogonal tiling. Its faces are dodecagrams, dodecagons, and apeirogons. Symbol is x6x6/5x∞*a. This one sounds like it would see blendy shenanigans, but no, it doesn't. Please stop trying to figure out what hexapeirotruncation is.
Below shows how the omnitruncates pair up as conjugates.
Conjuates:
The following are self-conjugate: qrasquit, thotithit, satsa, hatha
The following are conjugate pairs: grothat-quitothit
Category 4 --- Back to Tilings Home --- Category 6
Site by ThePokemonkey123
contact me on discord you don't get my email
Images from Stella